Skip to content
NEW: Martech Stack Builder on your phone →

Comparison

Martech Stack Builder vs FigJam

FigJam is Figma's collaborative whiteboard, built for brainstorming and ideation. For Martech stack architecture, a tool built for the job adds vendor data, a stack audit and procurement workflows.

The quick verdict

FigJam is built for design teams doing brainstorming and ideation. It shines at sticky note sessions, design critiques, and collaborative sketching -- especially when used alongside Figma for design workflows.

For Martech teams mapping their technology architecture, Stack Builder provides vendor data, a stack audit and procurement workflows that FigJam wasn't designed for. You get vendor nodes for 460+ vendors, lenses and RFI generation.

Feature Comparison

Feature
Martech Stack Builder
FigJam
460+ Martech vendor library ✓ —
Pre-built vendor logos & metadata ✓ —
Stack audit with an A-F grade ✓ —
AI diagram generation ✓ AI (general)
Lenses (data flow, cost, consent, ownership) ✓ —
RFI builder for vendor procurement ✓ —
Drag-and-drop canvas ✓ ✓
Figma integration — ✓
Sticky notes & widgets — ✓
Stamps & reactions — ✓
Free tier ✓ ✓
Image export PNG, SVG ✓

Why Martech teams choose Stack Builder

460+ vendor nodes vs sticky notes

In FigJam, mapping your Martech stack means using sticky notes and shapes, then manually adding logos and labels. In Stack Builder, you drag vendor nodes that already carry the logo, category and description.

  • Pre-built nodes for Segment, HubSpot, Salesforce and the rest of 460+ vendors
  • Vendor logos, categories and descriptions included
  • Search by name, category or capability
A ten-tool stack on the canvas, from consent and server-side tagging through Twilio Segment and Snowflake to Amplitude, Braze and Google Ads, with every connection named and the node palette open

Stack evaluation vs no analysis

FigJam's AI helps with general brainstorming tasks; it has no Martech vendor data to analyze. Stack Builder computes the duplicated capability in your stack, grades it A-F, names the overlapping tools and, from the costs you enter, prices what the duplication costs.

  • Instant A-F letter grades for your stack
  • Overlaps named and priced, with a verdict per tool
  • Numbers computed from your stack; the AI only writes the summary
A stack evaluation beside the canvas: grade C, $12,960 recoverable a year and 31 overlaps, with the critical pairs listed first

Multi-lens views vs flat canvas

On a whiteboard, a different perspective means another board to maintain. Stack Builder lets you switch lenses on the same diagram: Platform, Owner, PII Data, Consent, Cost, Lifecycle, Data Flow, Security and more. Free includes Platform and Owner; the rest come with Pro. Each lens recolours the same diagram, so there are no separate boards to keep in sync.

  • See who owns each tool with the Ownership lens
  • Track data classification and PII exposure
  • Visualize cost distribution across your stack
The Owner lens: every tool labelled with the department that owns it, and a legend of the four departments with their leads

Vendor procurement workflows built in

Stack Builder goes beyond the diagram. Draft an RFI from your stack, send it to the vendors and let the reminders chase them. Vendors answer on a page or in an Excel workbook, your team scores the answers side by side, and the decision is recorded with its reason. In FigJam, that’s separate documents, spreadsheets and a lot of follow-up email. Pro includes your first RFI; Consultant, Agency, Team and Enterprise include unlimited RFIs.

  • An RFI drafted from your stack, with a weighted scoring rubric
  • Vendor answers per question, on the page or in Excel
  • Side-by-side scoring and a recorded decision
An RFI in Stack Builder at the Draft stage: the five stages from Draft to Decide, the document vendors will answer, section by section with its weights, and the three vendors it goes to

When to use FigJam instead

FigJam is an excellent tool for many use cases. Choose FigJam when you need:

  • Design team brainstorming and ideation -- sticky notes, stamps, and reactions for collaborative thinking sessions
  • Design sprint workshops -- facilitated sessions with structured templates
  • UX flow planning alongside Figma designs -- in the same product as your Figma files
  • Quick collaborative sketching -- freeform drawing, connectors, and shapes for any ad-hoc visual collaboration

But when the task is specifically Martech stack architecture -- mapping your tools, evaluating your stack, and managing vendor decisions -- Martech Stack Builder gives you the specialized features FigJam doesn't have.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can FigJam map Martech stacks?
You can draw anything on FigJam's canvas, but it has no Martech vendor context. You'd need to manually create shapes, find and upload logos, and label every node yourself. There's no vendor catalog behind the shapes. Martech Stack Builder gives you vendor nodes for 460+ vendors with logos, categories and descriptions, ready to drag onto the canvas.
Does FigJam have Martech templates?
FigJam's templates are built for workshops and design work: brainstorming, retrospectives, critiques, research. Martech Stack Builder has 10 stack templates, from B2B demand generation to real-time streaming, built from catalog vendors with every connection documented.
Is FigJam free?
FigJam is part of Figma's plans, which include a free Starter plan; see figma.com/pricing for its current limits. Martech Stack Builder Free includes 3 cloud saves. Pro is $39/month with 20 cloud saves and a monthly AI allowance with top-ups; Consultant ($99/month) includes 5 client workspaces of up to 15 stacks each, and Team has unlimited saves.
Can I use both FigJam and Martech Stack Builder?
Absolutely. Many teams use FigJam for design workshops and brainstorming sessions alongside Figma, while using Martech Stack Builder specifically for Martech architecture planning, vendor evaluation, and stack governance. Each is built for a different job.
How does FigJam's AI compare to Stack Builder's AI?
FigJam's AI features are general-purpose: Figma lists summarizing stickies, sorting them and generating templates. In Martech Stack Builder, AI drafts a stack from a sentence, writes the narration on an audit and generates RFI documents. The audit grade itself is computed from your stack's duplicated capability, not produced by a model.
Which is better for team collaboration?
Both tools support team collaboration, but in different ways. FigJam excels at real-time brainstorming with cursors, sticky notes, stamps, and reactions. Martech Stack Builder's Team plan provides Martech governance: change requests with approvals, owner, admin, editor and viewer roles, department ownership and a recorded history of each decision.

See the difference for yourself

Build your first Martech stack from 460+ vendor nodes, then audit it and switch lenses.

Try it free View features

No credit card required. Free plan available.