Skip to content
NEW: Martech Stack Builder on your phone →
Convert logo

Convert

Privacy-focused A/B testing and experimentation platform for optimizing web experiences without relying on third-party cookies.

Founded 2009 Amsterdam, Netherlands 11-50 employees Bootstrapped Updated Feb 2026

Closest Convert alternatives

Ranked by reviewed relationship first, then by the capabilities they share with Convert.

Optimizely Web Experimentation logo
Testing 19 capabilities

Optimizely's web experimentation product: visual and code-based A/B and multivariate testing with audience targeting on…

Learn more 8 alternatives
Adobe Target logo
Personalization 18 capabilities

Enterprise personalization and A/B testing platform for delivering targeted experiences across web, mobile, and email…

Learn more 8 alternatives

Convert Pros & Cons

Key strengths and limitations to consider, drafted by an AI model from public sources

Strengths

  • Privacy-focused A/B testing
  • Strong enterprise compliance
  • Flicker-free experiences
  • Advanced targeting options
  • Good agency features

Limitations

  • Less intuitive than competitors
  • Smaller market presence
  • Limited AI features
  • Enterprise pricing

Ideal For

Who benefits most from Convert, drafted by an AI model from public sources

Quick Analysis

Convert is a privacy-focused A/B testing platform, competing with Optimizely, VWO, and AB Tasty in the experimentation space. It provides visual and code-based A/B testing, multivariate testing, and split URL testing — with a strong emphasis on data privacy, GDPR compliance, and minimal data collection.

Convert's differentiators are its privacy-first architecture (no personal data storage, cookieless tracking options) and transparent, straightforward pricing. It is ideal for privacy-conscious organizations, European companies under strict GDPR requirements, and agencies managing experiments for multiple clients. Compared to Optimizely (broader feature set, content experiments), Convert is simpler and significantly more affordable. Versus VWO (similar price range, broader CRO suite), Convert offers better privacy controls but fewer heatmap/session recording features.

Buyers should evaluate Convert if experimentation is the primary need and privacy compliance is a hard requirement. It's excellent for mid-market teams running web A/B tests without enterprise budgets. Consider Optimizely for full-stack experimentation with feature flags, VWO for a broader CRO toolkit, or PostHog for open-source experimentation bundled with product analytics.

1

Privacy-conscious organizations

2

European companies needing GDPR compliance

3

Agencies running client tests

4

Enterprise optimization programs

5

Healthcare and finance verticals

Per-Seat

Pricing

Model

usage based

Starting Price

$299/mo (paid annually) or $399/mo (paid monthly)

Reliability (from Convert’s status page)

Not enough status history yet (14 of 180 days observed).

Based on Convert’s own status page, last 180 days · coverage 8% · as of 24 Oct 2026. Self-reported by the vendor, not measured uptime. How this is worked out

Key Features

  • Visual editor for no-code A/B test creation
  • Code-based experiments for advanced variations
  • Multivariate and split URL testing
  • Bayesian and frequentist statistical engines
  • Privacy-first with no personal data storage
  • Advanced audience targeting and segmentation
  • Multi-domain and cross-origin testing
  • Revenue and custom goal tracking

Popular Integrations

Tools Convert is commonly connected to, collected by an AI model from public sources:

Google Analytics
Adobe Analytics
Segment
HubSpot
Salesforce

Convert provides an advanced A/B testing and personalization platform that helps businesses optimize their websites by testing different versions of pages to improve user experience and increase conversions (sales, sign-ups).

Checked and not offered

2 capabilities that other experimentation tools are built around, which Convert does not appear to cover. Each was checked against Convert's own documentation in three separate AI passes, and only a majority verdict is recorded — the count is on each row.

A gap is not a fault — a product that does one job well is a reasonable thing to buy. It is only expensive when you find out after signing.

Product Recommendations 5 of 23 experimentation tools have it

Checked Fullstack feature documentation for a product recommendation engine; product lists and recommendation settings are only example variable values.

Checked: https://support.convert.com/hc/en-us/articles/understanding-features-in-convert-fullstack· 3 of 3 passes agreed it is absent

Survey & Feedback Analytics 3 of 23 experimentation tools have it

Checked developer documentation for surveys, feedback collection, or survey analytics; none are documented.

Checked: https://support.convert.com/hc/en-us/articles/developers· 3 of 3 passes agreed it is absent

Runs alongside, not instead of

8 tools that overlap Convert on paper and were judged to do a different job in practice. Worth knowing before a consolidation exercise deletes one of them. These judgements were drafted by an AI model, and most were accepted on its confidence rather than checked one by one; the reason is recorded against each pair.

Convert + Airship Airship is a mobile engagement and messaging orchestration platform (push/in-app/SMS), whereas Convert is focused on web experimentation and personalization, with only limited overlap in segmentation and testing concepts. Convert + Algolia Algolia’s A/B testing and personalization are mainly in service of search and recommendations, while Convert’s core job is running website experiments and personalization across pages, so they are commonly used together. Convert + Amplitude Amplitude is used to analyze product/user behavior and build cohorts, while Convert runs the actual web experiments and personalization, so teams commonly use analytics to inform and evaluate tests rather than replacing it. Convert + Appcues Appcues is mainly for in-app onboarding and messaging while Convert is mainly for web experimentation, so overlap in targeting and A/B testing features does not make them realistic replacements. Convert + AppIce AppIce is a cross-channel engagement platform, while Convert is focused on web experimentation/personalization, so overlap in A/B testing is not enough to make them realistic replacements for each other. Convert + BlueConic BlueConic supplies profiles and audiences, while Convert tests variations of the experiences shown to them. Convert + Bmetric Bmetric decides which contact option (call, callback or form) each website visitor sees and tracks the resulting calls, while Convert runs site-wide A/B tests and personalization, so the two are used side by side. Convert + Contentstack Contentstack manages and delivers the content while Convert tests or personalizes how that content is shown, so the two can operate in the same web stack.

6 more pairs reviewed and judged complementary.

Free stack audit

Does something in your stack already do what Convert does?

The Instant Stack Audit reads your tools against a capability map and shows where two of them are being paid for to do one job.

Takes about two minutes. Your overlaps and a savings estimate are free — no sign-up. An email address unlocks the costed roadmap.

Add Convert to Your Stack

Use our visual stack builder to see how Convert fits with your other tools. Plan data flows, identify gaps, and share with your team.

Open Stack Builder

Claim the Convert profile

Use your work email. If your company acquired this product, or you handle it on their behalf, use your own address and tell us how you're connected — we check every claim by hand before sending an edit link.