Skip to content
NEW: Martech Stack Builder on your phone →
Make (Integromat) logo

Make (Integromat)

Visual workflow automation platform connecting apps and services through drag-and-drop scenarios with advanced data transformation and branching logic.

Founded 2012 Prague, Czech Republic 501-1000 employees Private (Celonis) Updated Feb 2026

Closest Make (Integromat) alternatives

Ranked by reviewed relationship first, then by the capabilities they share with Make (Integromat).

Zapier logo
Automation 11 capabilities

No-code automation platform connecting 6,000+ apps with workflow triggers, actions, and conditional logic for business…

Learn more 6 alternatives
n8n logo
Automation 12 capabilities

Open-source workflow automation platform with a visual editor, self-hosting option, and code-level flexibility for…

Learn more 6 alternatives
MuleSoft logo
Integration 13 capabilities
Learn more 8 alternatives

Make (Integromat) Pros & Cons

Key strengths and limitations to consider, drafted by an AI model from public sources

Strengths

  • Visual workflow automation builder
  • Extensive app integration library (1000+)
  • More affordable than Zapier for complex workflows
  • Powerful data transformation capabilities

Limitations

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Less polished UX
  • Smaller community and template library

Ideal For

Who benefits most from Make (Integromat), drafted by an AI model from public sources

Quick Analysis

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform, competing with Zapier, n8n, and Power Automate in the iPaaS/automation space. It connects 3,000+ apps through visual "scenarios" — flowchart-style workflows with routers, iterators, and data transformations that handle complex multi-step automation beyond simple trigger-action patterns.

Make's strength is its visual workflow builder and data manipulation capabilities — it handles complex branching, array processing, and HTTP/API operations that Zapier struggles with. It is ideal for marketing operations, RevOps teams, and technical marketers who need sophisticated automation without coding. Compared to Zapier (simpler, larger app library), Make offers more powerful data transformation and branching at lower cost. Versus n8n (open-source, self-hosted option), Make provides a more polished cloud experience but less customization.

Buyers should choose Make for complex, multi-step workflows involving data transformation, conditional logic, and error handling. Its pricing (based on credits) is typically cheaper than Zapier for similar workloads. Consider Zapier for simple two-step automations where ease of use matters most, or n8n for teams wanting self-hosted automation with full customization.

1

Technical teams automating complex workflows

2

Agencies building client automations

3

Companies migrating from expensive iPaaS

4

Data teams needing ETL automation

Freemium

Pricing

Model

freemium

Starting Price

$12/month (Core, 10k credits/month)

The Free plan is permanent and includes 1,000 credits/month, up to 2 active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, a 5-minute maximum execution time and 5 MB maximum file size.

Reliability (from Make (Integromat)’s status page)

100 / 100

worked out from the incidents Make (Integromat) declared

Outages per 30 days
0.0
0 in 180 days
Median time to resolve
—
no closed outage to time
Outage-free time (declared)
100.000%

Trend not enough history to compare · Degraded 62.6 h per 30 days, shown, not scored

Based on Make (Integromat)’s own status page, last 180 days · coverage 87% · as of 17 Oct 2026. Self-reported by the vendor, not measured uptime. How this is worked out

Key Features

  • Visual scenario builder with drag-and-drop
  • 1,500+ app integrations
  • Routers for conditional branching logic
  • Iterator and array aggregator for data processing
  • HTTP/Webhook modules for custom API calls
  • Error handling with retry and fallback paths
  • Scheduling with cron-like precision
  • Data store for persistent variables across runs

Popular Integrations

Tools Make (Integromat) is commonly connected to, collected by an AI model from public sources:

Google Sheets for data sync
Slack for notifications
Airtable for databases
Notion for documentation

Visual automation platform (formerly Integromat) for building complex workflows with branching logic. Make provides a drag-and-drop interface, advanced data transformation, and detailed execution history.

Runs alongside, not instead of

8 tools that overlap Make (Integromat) on paper and were judged to do a different job in practice. Worth knowing before a consolidation exercise deletes one of them. These judgements were drafted by an AI model, and most were accepted on its confidence rather than checked one by one; the reason is recorded against each pair.

12 more pairs reviewed and judged complementary.

Free stack audit

Does something in your stack already do what Make (Integromat) does?

The Instant Stack Audit reads your tools against a capability map and shows where two of them are being paid for to do one job.

Takes about two minutes. Your overlaps and a savings estimate are free — no sign-up. An email address unlocks the costed roadmap.

Add Make (Integromat) to Your Stack

Use our visual stack builder to see how Make (Integromat) fits with your other tools. Plan data flows, identify gaps, and share with your team.

Open Stack Builder

Claim the Make (Integromat) profile

Use your work email. If your company acquired this product, or you handle it on their behalf, use your own address and tell us how you're connected — we check every claim by hand before sending an edit link.