Make (Integromat) Alternatives
Workflow Automation · 6 compared · Updated
Looking to replace Make (Integromat)? These are the 6 closest Workflow Automation alternatives we track, ranked by reviewed capability overlap — the closest matches come first.
- Closest match
- n8n
- Direct replacements
- 6 compared
- Pricing
- Free · Freemium · Free tier available
- Typical switching effort
- Medium
No referral fees. Ordering is by reviewed capability overlap, not who paid us.
What Make (Integromat) is, in short
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform, competing with Zapier, n8n, and Power Automate in the iPaaS/automation space. It connects 1,500+ apps through visual "scenarios" — flowchart-style workflows with routers, iterators, and data transformations that handle complex multi-step automation beyond simple trigger-action patterns. Make's strength is its visual workflow builder and data manipulation capabilities — it handles complex branching, array processing, and HTTP/API operations that Zapier struggles with. It is ideal for marketing operations, RevOps teams, and technical marketers who need sophisticated automation without coding. Compared to Zapier (simpler, larger app library), Make offers more powerful data transformation and branching at lower cost.
Versus n8n (open-source, self-hosted option), Make provides a more polished cloud experience but less customization. Buyers should choose Make for complex, multi-step workflows involving data transformation, conditional logic, and error handling. Its pricing (based on operations) is typically cheaper than Zapier for similar workloads. Consider Zapier for simple two-step automations where ease of use matters most, or n8n for teams wanting self-hosted automation with full customization.
Make (Integromat) alternatives compared
Ranked by reviewed relationship first — a tool we've confirmed as a direct replacement outranks one that merely shares capabilities. Tools we've reviewed as complements to Make (Integromat) are excluded, because running both is not the same as replacing it.
Scroll the table sideways for switching effort and pricing →
| Vendor | Shared capabilities with Make (Integromat) | Switching effort | Pricing | Also strong in | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Partial overlap iPaaS / API Integration Workflow Automation Both are general-purpose workflow automation/iPaaS tools, but n8n is often run as a developer-controlled/self-hosted platform while Make is commonly adopted for business-owned automations, so some orgs intentionally use both. | Medium | Free | — | About n8n |
| | Partial overlap iPaaS / API Integration Workflow Automation Make and Zapier both automate app-to-app workflows, but Zapier is frequently used for lightweight business automations while Make is often used for more complex multi-step data transformations, so dual adoption is common. | Medium | Freemium | — | About Zapier |
| | Partial overlap iPaaS / API Integration Workflow Automation Both are integration/automation platforms, but MuleSoft is typically used for enterprise integration and API management while Make is commonly adopted for lightweight, team-level workflow automation. | Medium | Free tier available | — | About MuleSoft |
| | Workflow Automation | — | Tiered subscription with workflow-credit usage | Generative AI (Content) | About Copy.ai |
| | Workflow Automation | — | Freemium | Customer Data Platform Event Routing | About Tracardi |
| | Overlap is data-collection plumbing only | — | Custom | Dynamic Content Assembly Decisioning Engine (Next Best Action) | About Movable Ink |
What to look for in a Make (Integromat) alternative
Make (Integromat)’s core capabilities — check each alternative for coverage of these before shortlisting:
- Workflow Automation
- iPaaS / API Integration
Make (Integromat) alternatives — FAQ
What is the best alternative to Make (Integromat)?
n8n is the closest match among the 6 Workflow Automation alternatives we track. It shares 2 of Make (Integromat)’s core capabilities (iPaaS / API Integration, Workflow Automation). Both are general-purpose workflow automation/iPaaS tools, but n8n is often run as a developer-controlled/self-hosted platform while Make is commonly adopted for business-owned automations, so some orgs intentionally use both. The right choice depends on your existing stack — compare all 6 in the table above.
What should I look for in a Make (Integromat) alternative?
Make (Integromat)’s core strengths are Workflow Automation, iPaaS / API Integration. Prioritise alternatives that cover the capabilities you actually use, and that integrate cleanly with the rest of your stack — a replacement that doesn’t connect to your warehouse, CDP, or activation tools isn’t really a replacement.
How much do Make (Integromat) alternatives cost?
Pricing varies — alternatives here range across Free, Freemium, Free tier available, Tiered subscription with workflow-credit usage. Check each vendor’s page for current rates.
How hard is it to migrate off Make (Integromat)?
Across the alternatives on this page, the typical switching effort is medium. Expect to remap configuration and re-verify downstream integrations, but not to rebuild your data model from scratch. The switching-effort column above shows the per-vendor judgement.
Can I compare Make (Integromat) and n8n side by side?
Yes. Drop both onto a canvas in Martech Stack Builder and see how each integrates with your warehouse, CDP, and activation tools — then score them against your actual requirements before deciding.
Compare the rest of the field
Evaluating more than one? These follow the reviewed substitute graph rather than the category shelf, so they cross categories where the tools genuinely compete.
Before you replace Make (Integromat), check what you already own
Teams usually find the overlap is not where they expected. Name the tools you run and the Instant Stack Audit maps which ones duplicate capability — inside Workflow Automation and across the rest of the stack.
Takes about two minutes. Your overlaps and a savings estimate are free — no sign-up. An email address unlocks the costed roadmap.
Browse all Workflow Automation vendors
Stack Builder’s Workflow Automation page compares every vendor we track in this category, with capabilities, pricing, and a head-to-head for the closest pairs.
View all Workflow Automation vendors →Evaluating Make (Integromat) alternatives? Do it in your stack’s context.
Drop Make (Integromat) and the alternatives onto a canvas, see how they integrate with what you already have, and score them against your actual requirements — not a generic feature list.
No credit card required. Free plan available.