n8n Alternatives 2026, Compared Independently
Workflow Automation · 6 compared · Updated
No vendor pays to appear or rank here. Alternatives are ordered by our reviewed relationships, then shared capabilities.
On 11 March 2026, the US agency CISA added CVE-2025-68613, a critical n8n remote-code-execution flaw patched in December 2025, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog after evidence of active exploitation. Self-hosted teams on older versions are the most exposed.
- Closest match
- Zapier
- Direct replacements
- 6 compared
- Pricing
- From $19.99/month · From $12/month (Core, 10k credits/month) · From $2,000/month (billed annually)
- Typical switching effort
- Medium
No referral fees. Ordering is by approved relationship, then capability overlap. Nobody pays for a place in it.
Why teams look for n8n alternatives
What changed, when, and who it affects. Each reason links to its source, with the line it rests on.
-
Security ·
CISA lists n8n RCE flaw as actively exploited
CISA added CVE-2025-68613 (CVSS 9.9), an expression-injection RCE patched in December 2025, to its exploited-vulnerabilities catalog. This matters most for self-hosted teams on older versions and for organisations that must follow CISA patch mandates.
CVE-2025-68613 is the first n8n vulnerability to be placed in the KEV catalog.
The Hacker News -
Security ·
Steady stream of high-severity n8n security advisories
n8n publishes a security bulletin every two weeks. The 16 September 2026 bulletin listed many high-severity issues, including credential exposure and injection flaws in nodes. Self-hosters have to keep patching often.
Severity: High | Inline Agent Node-Tool Introspection Decrypts Any Instance Credential Without Ownership Check
n8n (community forum, staff post) -
Pricing ·
Pricing moved to executions; new self-hosted Business plan
n8n dropped active-workflow limits, started basing Enterprise pricing on executions and added a paid self-hosted Business plan for features like SSO, LDAP and Git environments. High-volume users and self-hosters who need those features are the most affected.
Enterprise pricing now scales with executions, not workflow count.
n8n Blog -
Retirement ·
n8n 2.0 drops MySQL/MariaDB and legacy features
n8n 2.0 removed MySQL and MariaDB as storage backends and dropped the Pyodide Python Code node and several nodes. It also tightened default security settings. Self-hosted teams on MySQL or MariaDB must migrate to PostgreSQL or SQLite before they upgrade.
n8n will no longer support MySQL and MariaDB as storage backends.
n8n Docs
What n8n is, in short
n8n is an open-source workflow automation platform, competing with Zapier, Make, and Temporal in the automation and integration space. It provides a visual workflow editor with 400+ integrations, custom code execution (JavaScript/Python), and the option to self-host — giving teams automation flexibility that SaaS-only platforms cannot match. n8n's strength is its combination of visual ease and code-level flexibility — you can build simple automations visually, then drop into JavaScript nodes for complex data transformation when needed. Self-hosting enables full data control and eliminates per-execution pricing. It is ideal for technical teams, DevOps, and data engineering workflows where cost control and customization matter.
Compared to Zapier (simpler, more integrations, higher cost), n8n offers more power at lower cost but requires more technical skill. Versus Make (visual-first, better UX for non-technical users), n8n provides more code flexibility and self-hosting. Buyers should choose n8n if they have technical team members who can self-host and want maximum flexibility with cost control. n8n Cloud is available for teams that don't want to manage infrastructure. Consider Zapier for non-technical teams needing simplicity, Make for visual-first automation with moderate complexity, or Temporal for production-grade microservice orchestration.
n8n alternatives compared
Ranked by relationship first — a tool approved as a direct replacement outranks one that merely shares capabilities. Tools judged to be complements to n8n are excluded, because running both is not the same as replacing it. Direct-replacement verdicts were checked by hand; the one-line verdicts were drafted by an AI model, and most partial-overlap verdicts were accepted on its confidence.
Scroll the table sideways for switching effort and pricing →
| Vendor | Shared capabilities with n8n | Switching effort | Pricing | Also strong in | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Zapier 7 core capabilities | Partial overlap Agent Builder / Orchestration Agent Interface (MCP / Tool API) Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents +3 more They overlap heavily as workflow-automation platforms, but Zapier is often business-user/SaaS-managed while n8n is commonly adopted for more technical or self-hosted use cases, so some orgs run both. | Medium | From $19.99/month | — | About Zapier |
 Make (Integromat) 6 core capabilities | Partial overlap Agent Builder / Orchestration Agent Interface (MCP / Tool API) Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents +3 more Both are general-purpose workflow automation/iPaaS tools, but n8n is often run as a developer-controlled/self-hosted platform while Make is commonly adopted for business-owned automations, so some orgs intentionally use both. | Medium | From $12/month (Core, 10k credits/month) | — | About Make (Integromat) |
 MuleSoft 5 core capabilities | Partial overlap Agent Builder / Orchestration Agent Interface (MCP / Tool API) Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents +3 more They both automate integrations and workflows, but MuleSoft is typically used as a governed enterprise integration layer while n8n is often used for lighter-weight automations. | Medium | From $2,000/month (billed annually) | — | About MuleSoft |
 Syncari 10 core capabilities | Agent Builder / Orchestration Agent Interface (MCP / Tool API) Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents +1 more | — | Estimate $21,258–$70,000 per year | Data Replication Reverse ETL | About Syncari |
 Copy.ai 5 core capabilities | Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents AI Assistant / Copilot Generative AI (Content) +1 more | — | From $24/month (Chat, 5 seats, billed annually) | Data Unification / Profile Stitching | About Copy.ai |
 Whalesync 3 core capabilities | iPaaS / API Integration | — | From $5/month | Reverse ETL Data Replication | About Whalesync |
What to look for in a n8n alternative
n8n’s core capabilities — check each alternative for coverage of these before shortlisting:
- Workflow Automation
- Agent Builder / Orchestration
- Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents
n8n alternatives — FAQ
What is the best alternative to n8n?
Zapier is the closest match among the 6 Workflow Automation alternatives we track. The two records share 6 core capabilities (Agent Builder / Orchestration, Agent Interface (MCP / Tool API)). They overlap heavily as workflow-automation platforms, but Zapier is often business-user/SaaS-managed while n8n is commonly adopted for more technical or self-hosted use cases, so some orgs run both. The right choice depends on your existing stack — compare all 6 in the table above.
What should I look for in a n8n alternative?
n8n’s core strengths are Workflow Automation, Agent Builder / Orchestration, Agentic AI / Autonomous Agents. Prioritise alternatives that cover the capabilities you actually use, and that integrate cleanly with the rest of your stack — a replacement that doesn’t connect to your warehouse, CDP, or activation tools isn’t really a replacement.
How much do n8n alternatives cost?
Pricing varies — alternatives here range across From $19.99/month, From $12/month (Core, 10k credits/month), From $2,000/month (billed annually), Estimate $21,258–$70,000 per year. Check each vendor’s page for current rates.
How hard is it to migrate off n8n?
Across the alternatives on this page, the typical switching effort is medium. Expect to remap configuration and re-verify downstream integrations, but not to rebuild your data model from scratch. The switching-effort column above shows the per-vendor judgement.
Can I compare n8n and Zapier side by side?
Yes. Drop both onto a canvas in Martech Stack Builder and see how each integrates with your warehouse, CDP, and activation tools — then score them against your actual requirements before deciding.
Compare the rest of the field
Evaluating more than one? Each alternative above has its own ranked comparison. They follow the approved relationships rather than the category, so they cross categories where the tools compete.
Before you replace n8n, check what you already own
Teams usually find the overlap is not where they expected. Name the tools you run and the Instant Stack Audit maps which ones duplicate capability — inside Workflow Automation and across the rest of the stack.
Takes about two minutes. Your overlaps and a savings estimate are free — no sign-up. An email address unlocks the costed roadmap.
Browse all Workflow Automation vendors
Stack Builder’s Workflow Automation page compares every vendor we track in this category, with capabilities, pricing, and a head-to-head for the closest pairs.
View all Workflow Automation vendors →Evaluating n8n alternatives? Do it in your stack’s context.
Drop n8n and the alternatives onto a canvas, see how they integrate with what you already have, and score them against your actual requirements — not a generic feature list.
No credit card required. Free plan available.